I don’t know what to think, mainly
because as long as the news gets out does it matter? I guess in a way Jarvis is
trying to hint at the fact that we are losing the traditional flow of news, and
instead have adapted to a linking process that will provide us news? That
sounds about right, and if that is what he’s getting at then he is absolutely right.
Rarely does the press play a role anymore unless it’s like governmental stuff.
Just the
whole concept is confusing. It feels like he’s going in one big circle about
how the press isn’t as important as it should be. I liked his simplistic
drawing those I was okay way and understood. But his concept…is he trying to
prove a point, is he trying to make a statement, blow off some steam? What gives?
If I understand this right I think he is trying to point out the fact that the press is not as relevant as it used to be. I AGREE! Between reading blogs and social media sites, I rarely need a press report from NY Times. Granted I will admit it serves as a half reliable source, but at the same time I don't really bother. By the time I give time to check a reliable source the new will be blown over. My relationship with news doesn't exist, but if it does then I think Jarvis would have hit the nail on the head.
If I understand this right I think he is trying to point out the fact that the press is not as relevant as it used to be. I AGREE! Between reading blogs and social media sites, I rarely need a press report from NY Times. Granted I will admit it serves as a half reliable source, but at the same time I don't really bother. By the time I give time to check a reliable source the new will be blown over. My relationship with news doesn't exist, but if it does then I think Jarvis would have hit the nail on the head.
No comments:
Post a Comment